Minnie Dlamini Takes Legal Action Against MacG and Sol Phenduka in R2.5m Lawsuit

Minnie Dlamini, a well-known TV personality, has filed a R2.5 million lawsuit against podcasters MacG and Sol Phenduka after they aired offensive remarks on Podcast and Chill. These comments caused her emotional distress and damaged her dignity. Moreover, the lawsuit highlights urgent issues of gender-based discrimination and online harassment in South Africa’s digital media. As tensions rise, this case marks a critical turning point in how the law tackles hate speech and misogyny.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

ALSO READ: MacG Denies DStv Show Cancellation Linked to Alleged Celebrity Plot Involving Cassper Nyovest

Who Are the Parties Involved in the Lawsuit?

The lawsuit involves Minnie Dlamini as the plaintiff and the co-hosts of Podcast and Chill, MacGyver “MacG” Mukwevho and Sol Phenduka, as defendants. Minnie accuses them of hate speech and harassment that targeted her specifically. MacG and Sol are well-known figures in South Africa’s entertainment scene, known for their unfiltered and often controversial podcasts. This high-profile legal battle places both sides under intense public scrutiny.

What Prompted Minnie Dlamini to Sue?

Minnie’s decision to sue arises from a series of remarks on the podcast that she describes as misogynistic and dehumanizing. Most notably, MacG and Sol speculated in an episode about the reasons behind Minnie’s past relationships, insinuating that hygiene issues were involved. Minnie condemned these claims as an attack on her dignity and an example of verbal abuse. The lawsuit alleges a pattern of gender-based harassment that intensified after Minnie publicly supported actress Amanda du-Pont in a separate abuse case.

In the discussion, MacG insinuated hygiene issues might have played a role. Dlamini called this offensive and unfounded claim “dehumanising” and “an attack on my dignity as a woman.”

Where Was the Lawsuit Filed?

Minnie Dlamini officially filed her complaint in the Equality Court in South Africa. This specialized court handles cases relating to discrimination and equality issues. By taking the matter here, Minnie aims to highlight the gender-based violence embedded in digital communication and hold the podcast hosts legally accountable for their remarks.

When Did Minnie File the Lawsuit?

The lawsuit was filed recently, with court documents submitted last week according to press reports. The timing is significant as public conversations about online harassment and digital hate speech have been growing louder nationwide. Minnie’s case gains momentum amid increasing calls for accountability in the South African digital media landscape.

Why Is This Lawsuit Important?

This case represents more than a personal grievance—it challenges the normalization of degrading women under the pretext of entertainment. Minnie demands R1 million for emotional distress and damage to her dignity, along with R1.5 million to be donated to a women’s rights organisation. Legal experts suggest that a victory here could establish important precedents for regulating podcast and online content, which currently operate with limited oversight.

“This isn’t just about me,” Dlamini said in a statement. “It’s about holding people accountable for normalising the degradation of women under the guise of entertainment. It’s time we draw a line.”

How Does the Lawsuit Address Accountability?

Minnie’s legal team demands more than financial compensation. They seek a court-approved public apology directed not only at Minnie but also at women in general. The court requires MacG and Sol to complete gender sensitisation sessions and perform community service addressing gender-based violence within six months. The respondents must also donate funds to Women for Change, a non-profit supporting women’s causes. This comprehensive approach promotes restorative justice while emphasizing education and awareness.

What Has Been the Public and Official Reaction?

The lawsuit has sparked strong national reactions. Deputy Minister Mmapaseka Steve Letsike condemned the podcast remarks as verbal gender-based violence. The South African Human Rights Commission and other bodies launched investigations. Despite the backlash, Podcast and Chill stays one of South Africa’s most-watched online shows. Its edgy, raw content fuels ongoing debates about freedom of speech and media responsibility.

Have MacG and Sol Phenduka Responded?

Although MacG issued a public apology on a later episode of the podcast, Minnie rejected the gesture, stating that “apologies without accountability mean nothing.” Neither MacG nor Sol Phenduka have made further public statements since the lawsuit was filed. Their silence raises questions about their next legal and public relations steps as the case moves forward.

Deputy Minister in the Presidency for Women, Youth, and Persons with Disabilities, Mmapaseka Steve Letsike, issued a strongly worded statement condemning the podcast’s remarks. “What was said on that platform constitutes gender-based violence in the form of verbal abuse and public shaming,” Letsike stated.

“We have referred this matter to the South African Human Rights Commission and other relevant institutions for investigation.”

What Does the Future Hold for This Case?

The Equality Court will set a hearing date later this year, marking the next chapter in this landmark legal battle. Observers watch closely, as this trial could influence how South African law tackles digital hate speech, misogyny, and the protection of dignity online. Beyond Minnie Dlamini’s personal quest for justice, this case catalyzes broader discussions on women’s rights, media responsibility, and societal values in the digital age.